Dear Seymour Taxpayers;
As Chairman of the Seymour BOE, John Putorti, I have read the comments
about the school budget and would like to offer clarity around some of the
misinformation and rumors that have been circulating. I conducted two sessions this spring in order
to present the facts and figures of the BOE budget and unfortunately very few
chose to attend and become more informed.
Please visit http://www.edline.net/pages/Seymour_Public_Schools/Board_Of_Education/Budget_and_Voting_Information/SEYMOUR_BOE_BUDGET_2012-13
for copies of the presentation.
I
encourage you to reach out to me directly to share information you may be hearing
so that we can discuss the facts. If you
have factual information that contradicts any of these statements I encourage
you to bring it forward.
·
I "I can’t pay more taxes.” – Are you certain that
yours will increase? A call to the Tax
Collector’s office will confirm your new payment. Not all taxpayers will see an increase. In fact there are many that will see no
increase or even a decrease with the proposed budget.
·
“ " The BOE must do more with less.” – Over the
past 3 years the BOE has received $677,000 while costs have risen over $3
million. The administration has worked
very hard to find the least impactful areas to cut and still provide as many
services as possible. That has led to
the comment, “the BOE got no increase, but were able to educate the children,
so they really didn’t need the money”.
We should be doing far more but continue to be constrained due to less
than optimal funding. The bare essentials
are no longer enough to produce college or career ready students.
·
“ "The superintendent makes too much money.” –
Actually the data shows that her salary is in the mid-range of her peers. The salary is fair compensation for the multitude
of responsibilities in the job description.
It should also be noted that the Central Office administrators have
returned their increases back to the town for the past few years.
·
“There are too many administrators.” – Comparing
our school district to Milford, Stratford or Hartford is not appropriate. In our District Reference Group (towns where
the socioeconomic demographic is similar), our staffing is very comparable. Often other districts have more
administrators than it appears at first glance because they are not called
principals but rather department heads or subject area coordinators. Seymour does not have that layer of
administration.
·
“ "Teachers should pay more for health insurance.”
– The fact is that with each contract renewal they have paid more. Both premiums and copayments have increased.
Details can be found on the district website.
·
“The BOE
doesn’t think about taxpayers.” – We are taxpayers too. No one wants to pay more. As a board we are charged with ensuring a
quality education for the youth in our town.
We evaluate incoming requests against our collective ability to pay on a
regular basis. We should be providing so
much more but understand that it is not possible at this time.
·
“ "Too much money is spent on salaries.” –
Education is a service organization. The
bulk of the cost goes towards the personnel who educate and support the students. Infrastructure expenses will always be much
lower.
·
“ "Private school costs less.” – At the high
school level the cost is very similar.
In per pupil spending Seymour ranks 157 out of 169 districts. Only 12 districts in the state spend
less. We don’t want a bargain education;
we want an excellent one for our students. Additionally, at many private
schools, tuition is less than the cost of the education – endowment funds and
fund raising typically pick up a portion of the cost of infrastructure and educating
students.
·
“ "The BOE threatens to cut programs to force the
public to pass their budget.” – There are no threats. Once a budget has been passed the BOE will
complete the difficult task of deciding what won’t be funded next year.
·
“ "We need more teachers and fewer
administrators.” – As adults we like to reflect on our childhood education and
say it is fine with fewer administrators.
That may be true. However, if you
saw the amount of work that is required to fulfill the current state and
federal mandates, I believe you would think differently. In order to comply with the paperwork,
evaluation standards, legal and reporting requirements, administrators are
essential. I would be happy to share
with you the volumes of information that we receive each month that we need to
understand and implement within our district.
The amount that needs to be read is mind-boggling.
"Please
consider these facts when you come out to vote on Wednesday, May 30th"
6 comments:
VOTE NO !!!
So, accounting for revaluation, the tax rate is increasing 1 mill. Blah! Blah!
That is still not a good reason to go up on our TAXES.
CUT THE OVERHEAD!!!!!!!
Other towns and Cities are having the same effects and are reducing their budgets to compensate.
While the current tax rate is 27.62 mills, revaluation and the grand list shrinkage alone — with not increased spending — would have required a tax rate increase to 31.95 mills. WHOA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
31.95 MILLS!!! Just because the town is receiving less revenue, does not give the town the authority to automatically raise the Mill rate to 31.95 Mills and expect taxpayers to makeup the difference.
Who do you think you are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CUT THE SPENDING!
NO INCREASE IN TAXES.....BETTER YET A DECREASE IN TAXES
NO INCREASE IN TAXES
get rid of a couple high overhead chiefs.....problem solved.....no tax increase.....maybe a reduction in taxes???
get rid of the dead wood
Post a Comment